MOTS-c vs SS-31

Mitochondrial-derived peptide vs Mitochondrial-targeted tetrapeptide · Head-to-head comparison

Both target mitochondria, and they sit at opposite ends of development. SS-31 went to a registered Phase 3 trial. MOTS-c has never been administered to humans in a published trial.

Side by side

 MOTS-cSS-31
ClassMitochondrial-derived peptideMitochondrial-targeted tetrapeptide
StatusResearch compoundInvestigational (Phase 3 as elamipretide)
RouteSubcutaneous injectionSubcutaneous injection
Typical vials5 mg, 10 mg10 mg, 50 mg
Dose range5 mg to 10 mg5 mg to 10 mg
FrequencyWeekly, often splitOnce daily
Half-lifeNo human data~3 hours
Dosing unitmilligramsmilligrams

Pharmacokinetics

No curves are shown, on purpose.

No published human pharmacokinetics for MOTS-c. Drawing one curve against an absent one would imply a comparison that cannot be made.

What the evidence supports

These grade how well each outcome has been studied in humans, never how well either compound works. A strong grade can sit on a negative result.

The strongest evidence for any claimed outcome is Human RCT for SS-31 and Human, observational for MOTS-c. That gap is the most important line on this page.

MOTS-c

OutcomeEvidence
Endogenous levels correlate with fitnessHuman, observational
Exercise capacityAnimal only
Metabolic homeostasisAnimal only
Any outcome from administration in humansNo data

SS-31

OutcomeEvidence
Barth syndromeHuman RCT
Dry age-related macular degenerationHuman RCT
Primary mitochondrial myopathyHuman RCT
Anti-aging or performance in healthy peopleNo data
Human RCTAt least one randomized controlled trial in people reports this outcome. The result may still have been negative.
Human, observationalReported in people without randomization: open-label, single-arm, retrospective, or case series.
Animal onlyShown in animals. No published human trial reports it.
No dataNo published evidence at any level that we could find.

How to choose

SS-31 has the only real clinical program here

Elamipretide reached Phase 3 in mitochondrial myopathy. It missed its primary endpoint, which is a published negative result and more than most compounds on this site have.

MOTS-c human data is observational, not interventional

Circulating levels rise with exercise and correlate with metabolic measures. Nobody has published giving it to anyone.

The targets differ

SS-31 binds cardiolipin, a structural target in the inner membrane. MOTS-c acts through AMPK signaling.

At the syringe

At the default setup on each compound's own page, a 10 mg vial in 2 mL puts 50 mcg on every insulin unit, while a 10 mg vial in 2 mL puts 50 mcg on every unit. That is the number that decides whether a dose lands on a readable mark, and it is set by how much water goes in, not by the compound.

Full references